Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 841 F.2d 1197 - Louis Neron v. James E. Tierney, Etc.

Louis Neron v. James E. Tierney, Etc.’s Empirical Analysis

841 F.2d 1197 · 1988

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
4
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 7 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Boylan (1990), State v. Santiago (1998)

43 federal appellate · 7 district · 7 state decisions

25019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Morrissey v. Brewer · Pointer v. Texas · Stone v. Powell · Irvin v. Dowd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'All would agree that an impartial jury is an integral component of a fair trial' and must be 'jealously safeguarded.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[C]ourts generally should be hesitant to haul jurors in after they have reached a verdict to probe for potential instances of bias, misconduct, or extraneous influences.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “However, misconduct allegations that `are frivolous ... do not trigger any duty of inquiry and do not require that a hearing be held.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.