Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 841 F.2d 139 - Davis v. Smith's Transfer, Inc.

Davis v. Smith's Transfer, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

841 F.2d 139 · 1988

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2018

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1101988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 45 U.S.C. § 56 (Federal Employers' Liability Act)

Relies on DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad · Shapiro v. Cook United, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not toll or affect in any way the continuous running of the applicable statutory time period”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Application of [a state savings statute] would tilt the balance struck between the national interests in stable bargaining relationships and finality of private settlements and likewise detract from the uniformity achieved by consistently applying the six-month time period contained in § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.