Brock v. Scheuner Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
841 F.2d 151 · 1988
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably Wilson v. Wilson (1995), Bamerilease Capital Corp. v. Nearburg (1992)
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 217
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Aro Corp. v. Allied Witan Co. · Odomes v. Nucare, Inc. · Joseph Kukla and Donna Kukla, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Intervenor v. National Distillers Products Company v. Penn Central Transportation Co., Third-Party
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inherent power to enforce settlement agreements entered into in settlement of litigation pending before them.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“court must enforce the settlement as agreed to by the parties and is not permitted to alter the terms of the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.