Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 841 F.2d 1558 - Rich v. Dollar

Rich v. Dollar’s Empirical Analysis

841 F.2d 1558 · 1988

Citation profile

311
cited by 311 later decisions
4
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

95 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 311 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Lee v. Ferraro (2002), Lassiter v. Alabama (1994)

95 federal appellate · 1 district · 25 state decisions

187019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 311 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “violated clearly established constitutional law.”
    39 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a government official can prove he acted within the scope of his discretionary authority by showing 'objective circumstances which would compel the conclusion that his actions were undertaken pursuant to the performance of his duties and within the scope of his authority.'”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.