Perez v. Curcio’s Empirical Analysis
841 F.2d 255 · 1988
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Keyser v. Sacramento City Unified School District (2001), Haglof v. Northwest Rehabilitation, Inc. (1990)
21 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Bates v. State Bar · Miller v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The evidence of the non-movant is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wright v. Rebeiro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.