Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 841 F.2d 42 - Eisenbud v. Suffolk County

Eisenbud v. Suffolk County’s Empirical Analysis

841 F.2d 42 · 1988

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Claim of Doe v. City of New York (1994), Mario v. Town of Fairfield (1991)

17 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

2601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Shapiro v. Thompson · Plyler v. Doe · Craig v. Boren

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “designed to further a substantial governmental interest”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the same type of mechanism approved in Barry for allowing the employee to forestall disclosure to inquiring individuals in certain circumstances is provided to the County employees. Indeed, the procedural safeguards provided by the Disclosure Board appear to go beyond what was thought to suffice in Barry. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.