Kurzweg v. Marple’s Empirical Analysis
841 F.2d 635 · 1988
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2014
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc. · Aerojet-General Corp. v. Askew · Nilsen v. City of Moss Point
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder the federal law of res judicata, a prior judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction bars a subsequent cause of action between the same parties as to not only all matters litigated in the first suit, but also all matters that could have been litigated regarding the same cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“state law determines the preclusive effect of a prior state court judgment ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.