Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 841 F.2d 77 - Smith v. Bounds

Smith v. Bounds’s Empirical Analysis

841 F.2d 77 · 1988

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2010

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Bounds v. Smith · Weinstein v. Bradford · North Carolina v. Rice · Ross v. Moffitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the district court treated it as such. That question too has been recently treated by us in Stamper v. Baskerville, 724 F.2d 1106 (4th Cir.1984), in which we relied on the language I have quoted above from Sanford and added:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “1B Moore's Federal Practice Sec. 0.404 p. 172 (1983). 19 The Supreme Court, in this very case, decided the questions before it on the basis that the district court had left to the State the choice of which alternative would”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “defendants' failure to respond to the December 21, 1984 order was not an isolated incident. Clearly, defendants knew or should have known that counsel had a history of failing to respond to the court's orders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.