United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
841 F.3d 760 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on United States v. Stroud · United States v. McKanry · United States v. Calderon-Avila · United States v. Gallimore · United States v. Watts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any unauthorized charges made with the ... device and shall be not less than $ 500 per access device.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Application Note 3(F)(i) ] does not require that the device actually have been used.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.