Robinson v. EOR-ARK, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
841 F.3d 781 · 2016
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 5
Relies on Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia · Faber v. Menard, Inc. · Courtyard Gardens Health & Rehabilitation, LLC v. Arnold · Donaldson Co. v. Burroughs Diesel, Inc. · 3M Co. v. Amtex Security, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that it shall inure to the benefit of and bind the parties, their successors, and assigns, including without limitation the agents, employees and servants of the Facility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stipanuk v. Williams“would be able to evade the arbitration agreement and thus eviscerate it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stipanuk v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.