Polymer Technology Corp. v. Mimran’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 321 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Verderber v. Cantello Plumbing Corp. · Carnegie v. United States · El Greco Leather Products Co. v. Shoe World, Inc. · American Airlines v. Christensen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). The retail solutions are generally packaged individually and their outer packaging contains a list of active ingredients and preservatives, a notice that the contents are sterile, warnings concerning contamination, contraindications, and shelf life, and tamper-evident seals on the top and bottom flaps. The solutions also contain an insert with directions and important safety information. 3 The other line of solutions is directed through authorized distributors to professional eye-care practitioners (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the population of entities to which defendants could sell its product”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.