841 F. Supp. 2d 164 - Harvey v. Mohammed’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 10 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “... Mr. Suggs’s MRDDA case manager was responsible for overseeing all of the components of Mr. Suggs’s individual habilitation plan (“IHP”), a written plan which detailed his strengths, weaknesses, and goals based on assessments by therapists, clinicians, and other health care professionals. The IHP is developed by the Inter-Disciplinary Team (“IDT”) comprised of clinicians such as a nurse, a speech and language pathologist, physical and occupational therapists, the MRDDA case manager, and the Symbral [qualified mental retardation professional]. Mr. Suggs’s MRDDA case manager was required to coordinate and monitor the IHP and was responsible for approving the IHP document. Additionally, the case manager was responsible for following up on medical recommendations made in the IHP to ensure that Mr. Suggs received those services. If Mr. Suggs was not receiving services in accordance with his IHP, the ease manager was expected to inform Symbral and the case manager’s supervisor. Mr. Suggs’s MRDDA case manager was required to visit him at least four times per year to carry out these responsibilities.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Harvey v. District of Columbia · 418 U.S. App. D.C. 321 - Harvey v. District of Columbia

2. “Punitive damages are warranted only when the defendant commits a tortious act accompanied with fraud, ill will, recklessness, wantonness, oppressiveness, willful disregard of the plaintiff's rights, or other circumstances tending to aggravate the injury.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). Therefore, to the extent the plaintiff's Amended Complaint can be construed as a request for punitive damages, the plaintiff has not made a showing sufficient to establish that the NCAA committed an intentional tort against her that was”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bradley v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

3. “actual or constructive knowledge of the risk of constitutional violations to the Evans class members unless adequate medical care was provided.” Id. at 187 . It was on the basis of these conclusions that this Court entered summary judgment for plaintiff on his § 1983 claim. Id. 6 . These include, for example, time spent on”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 951 F. Supp. 2d 47 - Harvey v. Mohammed