State v. Dickey’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2019
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc. · State v. Mendoza · State v. Bishop · 1 Utah 2d 117 - State v. Fedder · State, Department of Social Services v. Vijil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the restitution remedy itself provide[s] the trial court an alternate jurisdictional basis under which to compel defendant's payment of restitution. In addition to authorizing the court to make payment of restitution a condition of probation, ... Utah statutes also accord[ ] restitution separate legal effect that parallel{s] probation in sentencing and judgments....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Allen · State v. Nones“(1) When a defendant sentenced to pay a fine or to make restitution defaults in the payment of any installment, the court on motion of the prosecution, victim, or upon its own motion may require him to show cause why his default should not be treated as contempt of court, and may issue a show cause citation or a warrant of arrest for his appearance. (2) Unless the defendant shows that his default was not attributable to an intentional refusal to obey the order of the court or to a failure on his part to make a good faith effort to make the payment, the court may find that his default constitutes contempt and may order him committed until the fine or the restitution, or a specified part it, is paid. [[Image here]] (4) The term of imprisonment for contempt for nonpayment of fines or failure to make restitution shall be set forth in the commitment order. (5) If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that the default in the payment of a fine or restitution is not contempt, the court may enter an order allowing the defendant additional time for payment, reducing the amount of the payment or of each installment, or revoking the fine or order of restitution or the unpaid portion in whole or in part. (6)(a) A default in the payment of a fine or costs or failure to make restitution or any installment may be collected by any means authorized by law for the enforcement of a judgment. (b) The prosecuting attorney may collect restitution in behalf of a victim. (c) The levy of executi”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nones“(3)(a)(i) When a person is adjudged guilty of criminal activity which has resulted in pecuniary damages, in addition to any other sentence it may impose, the court shall order that defendant make restitution up to double the amount of pecuniary damages to the victim or victims of the offense of which the defendant has pleaded guilty, is convicted, or to the victim of any other criminal conduct admitted by the defendant to the sentencing court unless the court in applying the criteria in Subsection (3)(b) finds that restitution is inappropriate. Whether the court determines that restitution is appropriate or inappropriate, the court shall make the reasons for the decision a part of the court record. [[Image here]] (b) In determining whether or not to order restitution, or restitution which is complete, partial, or nominal, the court shall take into account: (i) the financial resources of the defendant and the burden that payment of restitution will impose, with regard to the other obligations of the defendant; (ii) the ability of the defendant to pay restitution on an installment basis or on other conditions to be fixed by the court; (ii) the rehabilitative effect on the defendant of the payment of restitution and the method of payment; and (iv) other circumstances which the court determines make restitution inappropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.