Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 841 P.2d 271 - Luu v. People

Luu v. People’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
6
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably State v. Calderon (2000), Key v. People (1994)

39 state decisions

1401992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Illinois v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Rose v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [federal] constitutional right to presence is rooted to a large extent in the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, but ... [that] right is protected by the Due Process Clause in some situations where the defendant is not actually confronting witnesses or evidence against him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. People v. Janis · Zoll v. People
  2. “€œto be present in his own person whenever his presence has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend against the charge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. People v. Cardenas · Zoll v. People
  3. “Due process only 'requires that a defendant be allowed to be present to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. People v. Mumford · Zoll v. People

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.