¶1Darren C. Dillon appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). He contends his sentence is illegal under this court’s decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), which held chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida, unconstitutional. Dillon’s claim is facially insufficient because he does not allege that the date of his offense was within the window established in Taylor. Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to Dillon’s ability to file a facially sufficient motion under rule 3.800(a).
841 So. 2d 587
Dillon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 28, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-03-28
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2013
5 state decisions
Relies on 818 So. 2d 544 - Taylor v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-03-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →