State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2017
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Nicholas v. United States · Hernandez v. United States · Lewis v. Adamson · Sanders v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The cross-examination of [the defendant] was brief, the questions were at the beginning of the state's cross-examination of [the defendant], and the questions were limited in scope. The evidence of [the defendant's] other arrests was not emphasized by the state, and it was not alluded to again in any witness's testimony or in the state's closing argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BRANYON v. State“You [defense counsel] asked if he had trouble with the law, not if he had convictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BRANYON v. State“Have you been in trouble before with the law on anythingever?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BRANYON v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.