¶2Movant, Donald Lee Young, appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record as submitted, and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
841 S.W.2d 776
Young v. State
Decided November 17, 1992
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1992-11-17
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2004
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-11-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →