Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 842 F.2d 1335 - United States Football League Usfl Imi Laefc v. National Football League Nfl R

United States Football League Usfl Imi Laefc v. National Football League Nfl R’s Empirical Analysis

842 F.2d 1335 · 1988

Citation profile

207
cited by 207 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

69 federal appellate · 23 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 207 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Delaware Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail Corporation (1990), Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc. (2005)

69 federal appellate · 23 district · 7 state decisions

89019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1291 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1293 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 207 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'failure to bring alleged inconsistencies in the verdict sheet to the court's attention before the jury has been discharged waives the right to have the alleged inconsistencies remedied in a new trial.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] monopolist may not, of course, use its market power, whether obtained lawfully or not, to prevent or impede competition in the relevant market.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not compel admission of otherwise inadmissible hearsay evidence,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.