Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 842 F.2d 194 - Kane v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission

Kane v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission’s Empirical Analysis

842 F.2d 194 · 1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
April 1998
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co. · Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Murphy · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Culpepper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Commission's determination to impose a particular sanction upon a member of the securities industry will not be reversed unless shown to constitute a gross abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.