Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

842 F.2d 217

Docket No. 88-1688.

Neuschafer v. Whitley

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Order Feb. 29, 1988.

Dissent March 7, 1988.

Order March 28, 1988.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-03-28

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2007

6 federal appellate ·

Relies on United States v. Arnaiz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges.

¶2ORDER

¶3The order filed February 29, 1988 has been ordered for publication along with Judge Chambers dissent filed on March 7, 1988.

¶4ORDER

¶5A stay of execution is ordered pending final disposition of this appeal.

¶6The parties are directed to file simultaneous briefs within 28 days; within 14 days thereafter the parties may file simultaneous responses.

¶7Circuit Judge CHAMBERS dissents from this order and will file a separate expression of his views.

¶8CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge,

¶9dissenting:

¶10My dissent on our Court’s order for briefs is that I think we had such splendid oral presentations on February 29 that I think we have enough in the record to decide the issues before us without the briefing that was ordered.

/842/f2d/217 · .json · Public domain