Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 842 F.2d 598 - Pineman v. Fallon

Pineman v. Fallon’s Empirical Analysis

842 F.2d 598 · 1988

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2013

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

1101988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer · England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners · Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the economic impact of the [statute] on the claimant; (2) the extent to which the [statute] has interfered with distinct investment-backed expectations; and (3) the character of the governmental action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the legislature merely made an adjustment of the benefits and burdens of economic life, not a taking requiring government compensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “physically invade or permanently appropriate any of the [plaintiffs'] assets for [the State's] own use.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.