Daury v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
842 F.2d 9 · 1988
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 17 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Lipsett v. University of Puerto Rico (1988), Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp. (1988)
27 federal appellate · 17 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Whalen v. Roe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“privacy right ... must often give way to considerations of public interest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To demonstrate that no genuine issue of material fact exists, the moving party must point out 'an absence of evidence supporting the nonmoving party's case.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Prokey v. Watkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.