Eves v. LePage’s Empirical Analysis
842 F.3d 133 · 2016
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Scheuer v. Rhodes · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Anderson v. Creighton · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Eves] worked his entire political career to oppose and threaten charter schools in Maine. He is the mouthpiece for the Maine Education Association. Giving taxpayers' money to a person who has fought so hard against charter schools would be unconscionable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eves v. LePage“the - 22 - balance of factors [from United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966)] will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Penate v. Hanchett“Eves v. LePage , No. 1:15-cv-300, 2016 WL 1948869 , at (D. Me. May 3, 2016). Most legislators have at least one other source of income, often in the private sector. Id. In fact,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Eves v. LePage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.