In re Nuvasive, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
842 F.3d 1376 · 2016
Citation profile
27 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 143 · 35 U.S.C. § 311 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review the PTAB's factual findings for substantial evidence and its legal conclusions de novo.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Substantial evidence is something less than the weight of the evidence but more than a mere scintilla of evidence,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.