Doe #1 v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
842 F.3d 833 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Kolender v. Lawson · Ward v. Rock Against Racism · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · Parker v. Levy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subsection (a)(2) burdens the First Amendment rights of all restricted sex offenders "by inhibiting the[ir] ability ... to go to a wide variety of places associated with First Amendment activity." For example, subsection (a)(2) potentially impedes the ability of restricted sex offenders to access public streets, parks, and other public facilities. .... While all parties agree North Carolina has a substantial interest in protecting minors from sexual crimes, it was incumbent upon the State to prove subsection (a)(2) was appropriately tailored to further that interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The State's appeal of the district court's final judgment came after briefing on its earlier interlocutory appeal regarding subsection (a)(3) was completed. The State's two appeals were consolidated for purposes of this proceeding, with the issue of subsection (a)(2)'s overbreadth addressed through supplemental briefing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“until and unless a limiting construction or partial invalidation so narrows it as to remove the seeming threat or deterrence to constitutionally protected expression.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.