Hill v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
842 F.3d 910 · 2016
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2024
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Brady v. State of Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“These limited circumstances include 'newly discovered evidence,' such as the police report or the grand jury testimony, under Rule 60(b)(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. Bauman“[The defendant] can prevail even if [ ] the undisclosed information may not have affected the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. Bauman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.