842 F. Supp. 407 - Hicks v. Small’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679 · 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 511 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Bell v. Hood · Bush v. Lucas · Schweiker v. Chilicky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen the design of a Government program suggests that Congress has provided what it considers adequate remedial mechanisms for constitutional violations that may occur in the course of its administration,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Hicks v. Small“consider[ation of] issues of law and fact involving the decision to reduce [Hicks'] benefits,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Hicks v. Small
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.