Baker v. Cuomo’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Price v. Johnston · United States v. Carolene Products Co. · Denton v. Hernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]laintiffs may within 45 (forty-five) days ... respond to the considerations outlined”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baker v. Cuomo · Baker v. Pataki“already been examined by the judiciary with uniform negative outcomes,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baker v. Cuomo · Baker v. Pataki“political empowerment of those convicted of crime [might] ... depriv[e] innocent citizens of the opportunity to guide the destiny of their municipalities or obtain representation at the county or state level.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baker v. Cuomo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.