842 F. Supp. 2d 147 - Weng v. Solis’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Conley v. Gibson · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Scandalous matters are allegations 'that unnecessary reflect[ ] on the moral character of an individual or state[ ] anything in repulsive language that detracts from the dignity of the court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he fact that [the] allegations may cast the [defendant] in a 'derogatory light' is insufficient to warrant the striking of allegations from the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.