Baber v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · Cotto v. State · Kincaid v. State · Patrick v. State · Baber v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where we find an irregularity in a trial court's sentencing decision, we have the option to remand to the trial court for a clarification or new sentencing determination, to affirm the sentence if the error is harmless, or to reweigh the proper aggravating and mitigating circumstances independently at the appellate level.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Howell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.