842 So. 2d 228 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Old Chief v. United States · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · 719 So. 2d 882 - Phillips v. State · 214 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Alexander · 408 So. 2d 1037 - Parker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“3. (Defendant) a. knowingly failed to register in person at an office of the sheriff of (name of county) County within 48 hours after establishing permanent, temporary, or transient residence within this state. b. knowingly failed to report in person at an office of the sheriff of (name of county) County within 48 hours after being released from the [custody, control, or supervision of the Florida Department of Corrections] [custody of a private correctional facility]. c. knowingly failed to register in person at an office of the sheriff of (name of county) County within 48 hours after having been convicted by a court in that county of an offense requiring registration. d. knowingly failed to provide an office of the sheriff of (name of county) County with [his] [her] [ (name the single unprovided registration item charged, as worded in the statute) ] [any one or more of the following items: [his] [her] (name the unprovided registration items charged, as worded in the statute). ] e. knowingly failed to report in person at an office of the sheriff of (name of county) within 48 hours after any change in vehicles owned to report those vehicle information changes. f. knowingly failed to provide an office of the sheriff of (name of county) with (insert information, such as criminal and corrections records, nonprivileged personnel and treatment records, and evidentiary genetic markers) , which [he] [she] knew had been deemed necessary by the Department of Law Enforcement and which ”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“1. (Defendant) a. is a sexual predator. b. has agreed or stipulated that he has been convicted as a sexual predator; therefore, you should consider the sexual predator status element as proven by agreement of the parties.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“2. (Defendant) [established] [maintains] a permanent or temporary residence in (name of county) County, Florida.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.