Stoletz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · 396 So. 2d 1107 - Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n · 789 So. 2d 1132 - Whipple v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nothing in section 322.28(2)(a)(2) prohibits a court from imposing a term of suspension or revocation longer than five years for a second conviction for DUI, and section 316.655(2) specifically permits a court to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stoletz v. State“the legislature did not contemplate the permanent revocation of a driver's license without the requisite number of DUI convictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stoletz v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.