Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 842 SO2D 895 - Hoffman v. State

Hoffman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 359 So. 2d 446 - Purifoy v. State · 650 So. 2d 666 - Levine v. State · Cordova v. State · Tide v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o prove indirect criminal contempt, there must be proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual intended to disobey the court,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.