Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

842 So. 2d 969

Pleas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-04-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2011

3 state decisions

Relies on Marshall v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BROWNING, J.

¶1We affirm the Appellant’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand for correction of the written judgment and sentence in lower court case number 98-3154 to conform with the oral pronouncement of the sentence. See, e.g., Marshall v. State, 652 So.2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Specifically, we note that the written judgment and sentence must make reference to the fact that, on count two of that case, Appellant was sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender.

¶2AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of written sentence.

BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
/842/so2d/969 · .json · Public domain