842 So. 2d 989 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Robertson · Richardson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Davis's statement was directly responsive to the judge's invitation to negotiate....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Calabro v. State“Oh, I already told you I was guilty of that, but the grand theft, no, no, no”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Calabro v. State“[A]t this point in time the State and you can negotiate back and forth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Calabro v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.