¶1A demand for postjudgment interest arises from the judicial process rather than directly from a commercial or consumer transaction, and is therefore not a “charging” under the usury laws. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc., 823 S.W.2d 603, 605 (Tex.1992). The court of appeals rendered the correct judgment because respondent presented the point that there was no charging of usurious interest. We neither approve nor disapprove any portion of the court of appeals opinion. 805 S.W.2d 916. Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
842 S.W.2d 278
36 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 452
Briones v. Solomon
Decided December 31, 1992
Texas Supreme Court · decided 1992-12-31
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2006
9 state decisions
Relies on George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc. · Solomon v. Briones
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1992-12-31
View the full empirical analysis of this case →