¶1ORDER
¶2Appellant Thomas Morris (Defendant) was convicted by a jury of forcible sodomy and robbery in the first degree. He appeals his conviction and the denial of his *586untimely filed Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The verdict is supported by the evidence, and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information, setting forth the reasons for this order.