Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 842 SW2D 694 - Ex Parte Barley

Ex Parte Barley’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Langley · Ex Parte Reynolds · O'HARA v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a cumulation order may not be entered once the defendant has begun to serve his sentence because such would violate the constitutional protection against being twice punished for the same offense .... newly imposed sentences may not be cumulated because the defendant has already served a portion of his sentence before having the execution of the sentence suspended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.