Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 843 F.2d 1240 - Ruff v. Kincheloe

Ruff v. Kincheloe’s Empirical Analysis

843 F.2d 1240 · 1988

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
July 2004
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2004

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

110198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · United States v. Frady · Sandstrom v. Montana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “might have contributed to the conviction”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “possibly influenced the jury adversely to the litigant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.