Horner v. Schuck’s Empirical Analysis
843 F.2d 1368 · 1988
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2021
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 39 U.S.C. § 1001 · 39 U.S.C. § 1005 · 39 U.S.C. § 101 (Air Carriage of International Mail Act) · 39 U.S.C. § 1206 · 39 U.S.C. § 1209 · 39 U.S.C. § 201 · 5 U.S.C. § 101 (Accountant, Compliance, and Enforcement Staffing Act of 2003) · 5 U.S.C. § 1101 (Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments)
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Russello v. United States · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · United States v. Connolly · United States v. Wong Kim Bo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There are sound reasons for Congress to establish in sections 7701 and 7703 different standards for the Director’s participation. Under section 7701, the Director’s participation before the board is in addition to the respondent agency’s participation. Under section 7703(d), the Director has sole authority to seek judicial review of a board decision that is unfavorable to an agency. The Director acts under section 7703 to protect the interests of the respondent agency or to protect the interests of the civil service as a whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kaplan v. Conyers“the board interpreted a civil service law by deciding whether it had authority under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7511 to apply CSRA principles to the placement of petitioners in a nonpay, nonduty status.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. Lynch“in deciding that the agency actions constituted furloughs or reductions in force, the board ... engaged in the interpretation of civil service laws and regulations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. Lynch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.