United States v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Teague v. Lane · Padilla v. Kentucky · United States v. Orocio · Chaidez v. United States · United States v. Chang Hong
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.