Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 843 NE2D 972 - Townsend v. State

Townsend v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Burnell · Impson v. State · Baysinger v. State · Collins v. State · Land v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Required Showings. An eligible defendant convicted after a trial or plea of guilty may petition the trial court for permission to file a belated notice of appeal of the- conviction or sentence if; (1) the defendant failed to file a timely notice of appeal; (2) the failure to file a timely notice of appeal was not due to the fault of the defendant; and (3) the defendant has been diligent in requesting permission to file a belated notice of appeal under this rule. (b) Form of petition. There is no pre-. scribed form of petition for permission to file a belated notice of appeal. The petitioner’s proposed notice of appeal may be filed as an Exhibit to the petition. (c) Factors in granting or denying permission. If the trial court finds that the requirements of Section 1(a) are met, it shall permit the defendant, to file the belated notice of appeal. Otherwise, it shall deny permission. (d) Hearing. If a hearing is held on a, petition for permission to file a belated notice of appeal, it shall be conducted according to Ind. Post-Conviction Rule 1(5).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`at first sight, on first appearance, or on the face of it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.