Locke v. Vanderark’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2011
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 39 Colo. App. 360 - Russell v. First Am. Mtg. Co. · People v. Taylor · 65 N.C. App. 626 - Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PA · Navarro de Cosme v. Hospital Pavia · Mauldin v. Lowery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inquiry into unrelated litigation requires ... that the witness be permitted to explain the nature, cireumstances, and the decision, if any, in each case to rehabilitate the challenged credibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we think harmless error is indicated by the record as a whole which reflects that the neurosurgeon was effectively impeached on a number of other topics relating to his credibility”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“this evidence would divert the jury's attention from the dispositive issues in the case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.