In re Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 459 So. 2d 520 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Whittington · 513 So. 2d 1173 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Reis · 633 So. 2d 150 - In Re Pardue · 683 So. 2d 714 - In Re Caulfield · 646 So. 2d 343 - In Re Quaid
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that the unauthorized practice of law by a suspended or disbarred attorney is very serious misconduct. In re: Jackson, 02-3062 (La.4/9/03), 843 So.2d 1079 . In general, when the attorney has manifested a conscious intent to flout the authority of this court by practicing after being prohibited from doing so, we have not hesitated to impose disbarment. See, e.g., In re: Jones, 99-1036 (La.10/19/99), 747 So.2d 1081 (attorney disbarred for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law on four occasions, after being suspended in the past for similar misconduct). [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Nalls
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.