843 So. 2d 1167 - Arnold v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is no longer used in the Louisiana Civil Code to identify a manner of extinguishment of the spousal support obligation. Instead, with regard to the modification or extinguishment of a spousal support obligation, LSA-C.C. art. 115 requires”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]ermanent periodic alimony . . . terminates if the spouse to whom it has been awarded remarries or enters into open concubinage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a judicial determination that the obligee has cohabited with another person of either sex in the manner of married persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.