Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 451 So. 2d 219 - Stringfellow v. Stringfellow · 691 So. 2d 897 - Holloman v. Holloman · 714 So. 2d 962 - Briney v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. · 8 Va. App. 246 - Npa v. Wba · 503 So. 2d 249 - Baker by Williams v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We will not disturb the findings of a chancellor when supported by substantial evidence unless the chancellor abused his discretion, applied an erroneous legal standard, was manifestly wrong, or was clearly erroneous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.