Tompkins v. Tompkins’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Phillips v. Phillips · Pope v. Pope · 777 So. 2d 141 - Somers v. McCoy · Dyas v. Dyas · 739 So. 2d 53 - Bryant v. Bryant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[w]hen a trial court does not make specific findings of fact concerning an issue , an appellate court will assume that the trial court made those findings necessary to support its judgment, unless such findings would be clearly erroneous.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kelly v. Kelly · Ramsey v. Ramsey“Under the ore tenus rule, the trial court's judgment is presumed correct and this court will not reverse the judgment absent a showing that the trial court's findings are plainly and palpably wrong or that the trial court abused its discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelly v. Kelly“`[T]his court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence on appeal or to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kelly v. Kelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.