¶2This case comes to us after an evidentia-ry hearing on remand. State v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 437 (Mo.App.1991). We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
843 S.W.2d 409
State v. Hampton
Decided January 5, 1993
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1993-01-05
Relies on State v. Hinton
Decided 1993-01-05