Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 843 S.W.2d 576 - State v. Evans

State v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Gonzalez (1993), Reyes v. State (1993)

41 state decisions

200199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Garza · State v. Kanapa · State v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The [S]tate is entitled to appeal an order of a court in a criminal case if the order: (1) dismisses an indictment, information, or complaint or any portion of an indictment, information, or complaint; (2) arrests or modifies a judgment; (3) grants a new trial; (4) sustains a claim of former jeopardy; (5) grants a motion to suppress evidence, a confession, or an admission, if jeopardy has not attached in the case and if the prosecuting attorney certifies to the trial court that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay and that the evidence, confession, or admission is of substantial importance in the case; or (6) is issued under Chapter 64.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he grounds listed in Rule 30(b) are illustrative, not exhaustive; the trial judge has the discretion to consider additional grounds for granting a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “motion to reconsider a plea ... should more aptly have been called a motion for new trial.”). In Evans , the Court of Criminal Appeals stated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.