Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 844 F.2d 1261 - Duncan v. Peck

Duncan v. Peck’s Empirical Analysis

844 F.2d 1261 · 1988

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2020 · most notably Wyatt v. Cole (1992), Jordan

33 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

47019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “private parties were [not] immune from suit at common law, and because the various rationales for good faith immunity are inapplicable to private parties....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'invested with [and ha[d] accepted] the responsibilities of a public official in the public interest.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “prior to the passage of section 1983, ... the common law required that the plaintiff must prove that the 'attachment was sued out wrongfully, maliciously, and without probable cause,' ... before a defendant could be held liable for the torts of malicious prosecution or wrongful attachment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.